Generating technological knowledge in Spanish universities: An exploration of patent data

References

Acosta M and Coronado D (2003) Science-technology flows in Spanish Regions. An analysis of scientific citations in patents, Research Policy 32: 1783-1803.

Adams J (1990) Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth, Journal of Political Economy 98: 673-702.

Anselin L, Varga A and Acs ZJ (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations, Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422-448.

Anselin L, Varga A and Acs ZJ (2000) Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities, Papers of Regional Science 79: 435-443.

Archibugi D (1992) Patenting as indicator of technological innovation: a review, Science and Public Policy 19(6): 357-368.

Audretsch DB (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14(2): 18-29.

Basberg BL (1987) Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature, Research Policy 16: 131-141.

Beise M and Stahl H (1999) Public research and industrial innovation in Germany, Research Policy 28: 397-422.

Bergman EM (1990) The economic impact of industry-funded university R&D, Research Policy 19: 197-422.

Boitani A and Ciciotti E (1990) Patents as indicators of innovative performances at the regional level, in Capellin R and Nijkamp P (eds) Spatial Context of Technological Developmenthttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0566071495, Aldershot: Avebury, pp.139-165.

Braczyk HJ, Cooke P and Heidenreich M (1998) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized Worldhttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0415303699. London: UCL Press.

Cameron A and Trivedi P (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Econometric Society Monographs)http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0521635675, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron A and Trivedi P (1990) Regression based test for over-dispersion in the Poisson model, Journal of Econometrics 46: 347-364.

Cameron A and Trivedi P (1986) Econometric models based on count data comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests, Journal of Applied Econometrics 1: 29-54.

Cooke P (1998) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized Worldhttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0415303699, in Braczyk H, Cooke P and Heindenreich R (eds) Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL Press.

Coupé T (2003) Science Is Golden: Academic R&D and University Patents, Journal of Technology Transfer 28: 31-46.

Etzkowitz H and Leydesdorff L (eds) (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relationshttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0826456731, London: Cassell Academic.

Etzkowitz H and Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy 29: 109-123.

Feldman M and Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 210-229.

Fischer M and Varga A (2003) Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria, Annals of Regional Science 37: 303-322.

Freeman C (1988) Japan: a new national system of innovation, in Dosi et al (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theoryhttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0861878949, London: Francis Pinter, pp.330-348.

Friedman J and Silberman J (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 28: 17-30.

Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661-1707.

Grupp H and Schmoch U (1999) Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation, Research Policy 28: 377-396.

Henderson R, Jaffe AB and Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988, The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1): 119-128.

Jaffe A, Fogarty M and Banks (1998) Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other labs on commercial innovations, Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2): 183-205.

Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M and Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598.

Jaffe A and Trajtenberg M (1996) Flows of knowledge from Universities and Federal Labs: modelling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries, NBER working paper 5712.

Karlsson C and Wei-Bin Z (2001) The role of universities in regional development. Endogenous human capital and growth in a two-region model, Annals of Regional Science 35: 179-197.

Leydesdorff L (2000) The Triple Helix: an evolutionary model of innovation, Research Policy 29: 243-255.

Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-42.

Lundvall BÅ (ed) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learninghttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=1855670631, London: Pinter Publishers.

MacPherson A (2002) The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation: The case of New York State's medical device sector, Papers in Regional Science 81: 121-129.

Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and innovation, Research Policy 20: 1-12.

Mansfield E (1998) Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings, Research Policy 26: 773-776.

Mansfield E and Lee JY (1996) The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support, Research Policy 25: 1047-1058.

Markusen AR, Hall P and Glasmeier A (1986) High Tech America: The What, How, Where and Why of the Sunrise Industrieshttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0043381391, Boston: Allen & Unwin.

Martin F (1998) The economic impact of Canadian University R&D, Research Policy 27: 677-687.

Meyer M (2000) Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy 29: 409-434.

Meyer-Krahmer F and Schmoch U (1998) Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy 27: 835-851.

Miyata Y (2000) An empirical analysis of innovative activity of universities in the United States, Technovation 20: 413-425.

Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN and Ziedonis A (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayth-Dole Act of 1980, Research Policy 30: 99-119.

Narin F, Hamilton KS and Olivastro D (1997) The increasing linkage between US technology and public science, Research Policy 26: 317-330.

Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysishttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0195076176, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nelson RR and Winter S (1982) Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press)http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0674272285, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Nijkamp P and Poot J (1998) Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth, Annals of Regional Science 32: 7-37.

Owen-Smith J and Powell W (2003) The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity, Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711.

Pavitt K (1988) Uses and abuses of patent statistics, in Raan AFJY (ed) Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technologyhttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0444705376, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.509-536.

Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy 98(5): S71-S102.

Romer P (1994) The origins of endogenous growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 3-22.

Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0674753402, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Schartinger D, Rammer C, Fischer MM and Fröhlich J (2002) Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants, Research Policy 31: 303-328.

Smith K (1995) Interactions in knowledge systems: foundations, policy implications and empirical methods, STI Review 16: 69-102.

Sternberg R and Tamásy C (1999) Munich in Germany is no 1 high technology region: empirical evidence, theoretical explanations and the role of small firm/large firm relationships, Regional Studies 33(4): 367-377.

Tijssen RJW (2001) Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Research Policy 30: 35-54.

Thursby J, Jensen R and Thursby M (2001) Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major US Universities, Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 59-72.

Thursby J and Thursby M (2002) Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing, Management Science 48(1): 90-104.

Thursby J and Thursby M (2003) Industry/University Licensing: Characteristics, Concerns and Issues from the Perspective of the Buyer, Journal of Technological Transfer 28: 207-213.

Thursby J and Kemp S (2002) Growth and Productive Efficiency of University Intellectual Property Licensing, Research Policy 31: 109-124.

Trajtenberg M (1990) A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations, Rand Journal of Economics 21(1): 172-187.

Varga A (1998) University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfershttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=innovmanagpol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=079238248X, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M, Andres P, Zimmermann E and Deleus F (2002) Linking science to technology: using bibliographic reference in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics 54(3): 339-420.

Wever E and Stam E (1999) Cluster of High Tecnology SMEs: The Dutch Case, Regional Studies 33(4): 391-400.

Zucker L, Darby M and Armstrong J (2000) University Science, Venture Capital, and the Performance of US Biotechnology Firms, Los Angeles: Mimeo, University of California.

Bookmark and Share

Navigate: Article Page | Contents | Top of page

Sign Me Up

*Email Address
First Name
Surname

Web Feed

Latest Articles

Special Issues

Collaborative and Challenge-led Innovation
Volume 14/2
Summary | Contents

Public Sector Innovation
Volume 12/2
Summary | Contents

Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies
Volume 12/1
Summary | Contents

Innovation Policy in the Creative Industries
Volume 11/2
Summary | Contents

Innovation and the City – Innovative Cities
Volume 10/2-3
Summary | Contents

Food-related Innovation: Technology, Genetics and Consumer Impacts
Volume 10/1
Summary | Contents

Nurturing the Knowledge Tree: CSIRO in Australia's Innovation Systems
Volume 9/2
Summary | Contents

Innovation in China: Harmonious Transformation?
Volume 8/1-2
Summary | Contents

Innovation and Economic Development: Lessons from Latin America
Volume 7/2-3
Summary | Contents

Biotechnology and Telecommunications: Conditions and Processes for Emerging Technologies
Volume 7/1
Summary | Contents

Corporate Sustainability: Governance, Innovation Strategy, Development and Methods
Volume 6/2
Summary | Contents

Asia Pacific Innovation Readings
Volume 4/1-3
Summary | Contents

crossref.org - The citation linking backbone



Website by Arrowsmith Websites Sunshine Coast. Business & Government Websites, Social Media, Web Hosting, Domain Names & SEO. Website Design Sunshine Coast, Australia.