Examining partner experience in cross-sector collaborative projects focused on the commercialization of R&D

Paul K Couchman
Department of Management, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport QLD

Liz Fulop
Department of Management, Griffith Business School, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Southport QLD

PP: 85

Abstract

The paper reports key findings from a four year study of cross-sector collaborative R&D projects in Australia testing a theoretical model formulated to explain partner collaboration experience and perceived project success.

The study contributes to the understanding of knowledge-intensive collaborations, and indicates how their benefits can be sustained under conditions of high uncertainty. The study was of cross-sector collaborative projects within the Australian Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) Program which involved multiple partners and which were focused on the commercialization of R&D. The model was empirically tested through a survey of project leaders and the results provided support for the three main effects hypothesized.

The theoretical, methodological and practical implications of the study's findings for the field of interorganizational relations (IOR) are discussed, and a new construct of project management competence is proposed as a determinant of positive partner experiences at the project level.

This study adds to the growing body of work on interorganizational collaborative arrangements by providing systematic empirical support for a theoretical model of cross-sector R&D collaboration at the project level and at the completion or near completion phase of project development.

 


Acknowledgements

 

The authors of this paper would like to gratefully acknowledge the expert assistance provided to us for the initial PLS Graph analysis of our survey data by Leonie Miller and Peter Caputi of the Department of Psychology at the University of Wollongong. We would also like to acknowledge that the research on which the paper was based was funded by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Grant. We wish to sincerely thank all reviewers for their very helpful and insightful comments.

| More

Keywords

cross-sector R&D collaboration, commercialization, relational trust, project management competence, partner experience, project success


View references

References

Armstrong JS and Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research 14(3): 396-402.

Barclay D, Higgins C and Thompson R (1995) The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption as an illustration, Technology Studies 2(2): 285-309.

Barnes TA, Pashby IR and Gibbons AM (2002) Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects, European Management Journal 20(3): 272-285.

Barnes TA, Pashby IR and Gibbons AM (2006) Managing collaborative R&D projects: Development of a practical management tool, International Journal of Project Management 25(5): 395-404.

Bigley GA and Pearce JL (1998) Straining for shared meaning in organization science; problems of trust and distrust, Academy of Management Review 23(3): 405-421.

Boersma MF, Buckley PJ and Ghauri PN (2002) Trust in international joint venture relationships, Journal of Business Research 56(12): 1031-1042.

Bonaccorsi A and Piccaluga A (1994) A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships, R&D Management 24(3): 229-247.

Brockhoff K and Teichert T (1995) Cooperative R&D and partners' measures of success, International Journal of Technology Management 10(1): 111-123.

Bstieler L (2006) Trust formation in collaborative new product development, Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1): 56-72.

Burnham JB (1997) Evaluating industry/university research linkages, Research Technology Management 40(1): 52-55.

Champness M (2000) Helping industry and universities collaborate, Research Technology Management 43(4): 8-10.

Chin W (1998a) Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling, MIS Quarterly 22(1): vii-xvi.

Chin W (1998b) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling, in Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern Methods for Business Research, pp.295-336, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.

Chin W (2001) PLS-Graph User's Guide Version 3.0, Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston TX.

Couchman PK and Fulop L (2004) Managing cross-sector R&D collaborations: Lessons from an international case study, Prometheus 22(2): 151-167.

Cummings LL and Bromiley P (1996) The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI) in Kramer EM and Tyler TR (eds) Trust in Organizations - Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp.302-390, Sage, London.

Cyert RM and Goodman PS (1997) Creating effective university-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective, Organizational Dynamics 25(4): 45-57.

Das TK and Teng B-S (2001) Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated approach, Organization Studies 22(2): 251-284.

Davenport S, Davies J and Grimes C (1999) Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference, Technovation 19(1): 31-40.

de Laat P (1997) Research and development alliances: ensuring trust by mutual commitments, in Ebers M (ed) The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks, pp.146-173, Oxford University Press, New York.

Dodgson M (1993) Learning, trust and technological collaboration, Human Relations 46(1): 77-95.

Dyer JH and Chu W (2003) The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan and Korea, Organization Science 14(1): 57-68.

Ernst H and Teichert T (1998) The R&D/Marketing interface and single informant bias in NPD research: An illustration of a benchmarking case study, Technovation 18(12): 721-739.

Feller I, Ailes CP and Roessner JD (2002) Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers, Research Policy 31(3): 457-474.

Fontana R, Geuna A and Matt M (2006) Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling, Research Policy 35(2): 309-323.

Fornell C and Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.

Gassmann O and von Zedtwitz M (1999) New concepts and trends in international R&D organization, Research Policy 28(2-3): 231-250.

Gefen D and Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16(1): 91-109.

Geisler E (1995) Industry-university technology cooperation: A theory of inter-organizational relationships, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7(2): 217-228.

Genefke J (2001) Collaboration costs, in Tallieux T (ed) Collaboration Strategies and Multi- Organizational Partnerships, pp.26-32, Garant, Leuven-Apeldoorn, Netherlands.

Gregory EH (1997) University-industry strategic partnerships: Benefits and impediments, Industry and Higher Education 11(4): 253-254.

Hagedoorn J and van Kranenburg H (2003) Growth patterns in R&D partnerships: An exploratory statistical study, International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(4): 517-531.

Hagedoorn J, Link AN and Vonortas NS (2000) Research partnerships, Research Policy 29(4-5): 567-586.

Häusler J, Hohn H-W and Lütz S (1995) Contingencies of innovation networks: A case study of successful interfirm R&D collaboration, Research Policy 23(1): 47-66.

Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies, Strategic Management Journal 20(2): 195-204.

Jap SD (2001) Pie-sharing in complex collaboration contexts, Journal of Marketing Research 38(1): 86-99.

Jöreskog KG and Wold H (1982) The MLS and PLS techniques for modelling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects, in Wold H and Jöreskog KG (eds) Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction 1: 263-270, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Kadefors A (2004) Trust in project relationships - inside the black box, International Journal of Production Management 22(3): 175-182.

Ketokivi MA and Schroeder RG (2004) Perceptual measures of performance: fact or fiction? Journal of Operations Management 22(3): 247-264.

Krishnan R, Martin X and Noorderhaven NG (2006) When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal 49(5): 894-917.

Lages C, Lages CR and Lages LF (2005) The RELQUAL scale: A measure of relationship quality in export market ventures, Journal of Business Research 58(8): 1040-1048.

Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ and Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities, Academy of Management Review 23(3): 438-588.

Liebeskind JP and Oliver AL (1998) From handshake to contract: Intellectual property, trust, and the social structure of academic research, in Lane C and Bachmann R (eds) Trust Within and Between Organizations, pp.118-145, Oxford University Press, New York.

Lhuillery S and Pfister E (2009) R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from the CIS data, Research Policy 38(1): 45-57.

McMillan G, Narin F and Deeds DL (2000) An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology, Research Policy 29(1): 1-8.

Mohr J and Spekman R (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal 15(2): 135-152.

Moorman C, Zaltman G, and Deshpande R (1992) Relationships between providers and users of marketing research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations, Journal of Marketing Research 29(3): 314-329.

Mora-Valentin EM, Montoro-Sanchez A and Guerras-Martin LA (2004) Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations, Research Policy 33(1): 17-40.

Murray F (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering, Research Policy 31(8-9): 1389-1403.

Nooteboom B (1999) Inter-Firm Alliances-Analysis and Design, Routledge, London.

Nunally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Okubu Y and Sjöberg C (2000) The changing pattern of industrial scientific research collaboration in Sweden, Research Policy 29(1): 81-98.

Parker RA and Rea LM (1997) Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide 2nd edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA.

Project Management Institute (1996) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Upper Darby PA.

Richards M and De Carolis DM (2003) Joint venture research and development activity: An analysis of the international biotechnology industry, Journal of International Management 9(1): 33-49.

Ring PS (1996) Fragile and resilient trust and their roles in economic exchange, Business & Society 35(2): 148-175.

Ring PS and Van de Ven AH (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, Strategic Management Journal 13(7): 483-498.

Ring PS and Van de Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships, Academy of Management Review 19(1): 90-118.

Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS and Camerer C (1998) Not so different at all: A cross-discipline view of trust, Academy of Management Review 23(3): 393-404.

Ryan P, Gibblin M and Walsh E (2004) From subcontracted R&D to joint collaboration: The role of trust in facilitating this process, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 1(2): 205-231.

Sako M (1992) Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

Sako M (1997) Does trust improve business performance? In Lane C and Bachmann R (eds) Trust Within and Between Organizations, pp.90-117, Oxford University Press, New York.

Sako M and Helper S (1998) Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34(3): 387-417.

Santoro MD and Betts SC (2002) Making industry - university partnerships work, Research Technology Management 45(3): 42-46.

Santoro MD and Chakrabarti AK (1999) Building industry-university research centers: Some strategic considerations, International Journal of Management Reviews 1(3): 225-244.

Schartinger D, Rammer C, Fischer MM and Fröhlich J (2002) Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants, Research Policy 31(3): 303-328.

Sheth J and Parvatiyar A (1995) The evolution of relationship marketing, International Business Review 4(4): 397-418.

Starbuck E (2001) Optimizing university research collaborations, Research Technology Management 44(1): 40-44.

Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M and Lauro C (2005) PLS path modelling, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48(1): 159-205.

Yi MY and Davis FD (2003) Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition, Information Systems Research 14(1): 146-169.



Sign Me Up

*Email Address
First Name
Surname

Web Feed

Latest Articles

Special Issues

Collaborative and Challenge-led Innovation
Volume 14/2
Summary | Contents


Public Sector Innovation
Volume 12/2
Summary | Contents


Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies
Volume 12/1
Summary | Contents


Innovation Policy in the Creative Industries
Volume 11/2
Summary | Contents


Innovation and the City – Innovative Cities
Volume 10/2-3
Summary | Contents


Food-related Innovation: Technology, Genetics and Consumer Impacts
Volume 10/1
Summary | Contents


Nurturing the Knowledge Tree: CSIRO in Australia's Innovation Systems
Volume 9/2
Summary | Contents


Innovation in China: Harmonious Transformation?
Volume 8/1-2
Summary | Contents


Innovation and Economic Development: Lessons from Latin America
Volume 7/2-3
Summary | Contents


Biotechnology and Telecommunications: Conditions and Processes for Emerging Technologies
Volume 7/1
Summary | Contents


Corporate Sustainability: Governance, Innovation Strategy, Development and Methods
Volume 6/2
Summary | Contents


Asia Pacific Innovation Readings
Volume 4/1-3
Summary | Contents


crossref.org - The citation linking backbone



Website by Arrowsmith Websites Sunshine Coast. Business & Government Websites, Social Media, Web Hosting, Domain Names & SEO. Website Design Sunshine Coast, Australia.