Rethinking science, technology and innovation (STI) institutions in developing countries
Jorge Niosi
Department of Management and Technology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada Research Chair on the Management of Technology, Montréal, Québec, Canada
PP: 250 - 268
Abstract
Developing countries need appropriate science, technology and innovation (STI) policies in order to absorb, diffuse and master advanced knowledge that fosters growth. They also need them in order to nurture new dynamic sectors. In many developing countries, public expenditures on R&D are invested in university research and public laboratories.
Industrial R&D is most often lagging behind, in spite of several government incentives. Business expenditures on R&D (BERD), as a consequence, are small in absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP.
The paper suggests that several factors explain this situation, including badly designed incentives, reduced government commitment to these incentives, lack of appropriate vertical STI policies, and high levels of causal ambiguity around specific policy incentives. This paper argues that increased government commitment, policy evaluation and the implementation of vertical STI policies aimed at creating new sectors can solve the technological stalemate.
Keywords
science, technology and innovation institutions; development planning and policy; technological change; research and development; business expenditures; vertical STI policies
References
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas- Collel, A, and Sapir, A. (2009) The governance and performance of research universities: Evidence from Europe and the US. National Bureau of Economic Research WP 14851, Cambridge, MA.
Alcorta, L., and Peres, W. (1997) Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin American and the Caribbean, Research Policy 26: 857-881.
Anchordoguy, M. (1989) Computers Inc. Japan's challenge to IBM, Harvard University Press, Boston.
Archibugi, D., and Pianta, M. (1992) Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: the analysis of patent data, Research Policy 21: 79-93.
Archibugi, D., and Pianta, M. (1994) Aggregate convergence and sectoral specialisation in innovation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4: 17-33.
Arocena, R., and Sutz, J. (2001) Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities, Research Policy 30: 1221-1234.
Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S. N. and Lane, D. A. (Eds.) (1983) The economy as an evolving complex system II, Perseus, Reading, MA.
Audretsch, D., Bozeman, B., Combs K.L., Feldman, M. Link, A. N., Siegel, D. N., Stephan, P., Tassey, G., and Wessner, C. (2002) The economics of science and technology, The Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 155-203.
Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2005) Evolutionary innovation and high-tech policy: What can we learn from Israel's targeting venture capital, The Samuel Nemean Institute Working Papers 25.
Axelrod, R. (1997) The complexity of cooperation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Becher, G. and Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.) (1995) Evaluation of technology programmes in Germany, Kluwer, Boston.
Benavente, J. M., González, R. and Olivari, J. (2007) The effect of public subsidies on private R&D spending in Chilean manufacturing firms, Universidad de Chile Intellis Working Paper, Santiago.
Billings, B. A. (2003) Are US tax incentives for corporate R&D likely to motivate American firms to conduct research abroad? Tax Executive 7-8: 291-315.
Branscomb, L. and Keller, J. (eds.)(1998) Investing in innovation, creating a research and innovation policy that works, MIT Press, Boston.
Bresnitz, D. (2005) The Israeli software industry. In A. Arora and A. Gambardella (Eds.), From underdogs to tigers: The rise and growth of the software industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland, and Israel, pp. 72-98, Oxford University Press, New York.
Burns, T., and Dietz, T. (2001) Revolutions. An evolutionary approach, International Sociology 16(4): 531-555.
Bush, V. (1945) Science, the endless frontier. A report to the President, US Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Canadian Chamber of Commerce (2007) Improving the scientific research and experimental development tax incentives, Submission in response to the Joint Finance Canada-Canada Revenue Agency Consultation, Ottawa.
Chen, L.-C. (2009) Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan's machine tool industry, Research Policy 38(3): 527-535.
Chudnovsky, D., Niosi, J. and Bercovich, N. (2000) Sistemas nacionales de innovación, procesos de aprendizaje y política tecnológica: una comparación de Argentina y Canadá, Desarrollo Económico 158: 213-252.
Cimoli, M., Dosi, G. and Stiglitz, J. (2008) The future of industrial policies in the new millennium: Toward a knowledge-centred development agenda, LEM (Laboratory of Economics and Management) Working Paper Series, Pisa.
Cohen M.D., Burkhart R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien M. and Winter S. (1996) Routines and other recurrent action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 653-698.
Crow, M. and Bozeman, B. (1998) Limited by design. National laboratories in the US national innovation system, Columbia University Press, New York.
Dalhman, C. and Frischtak, C. (1993) National systems supporting technical advance in industry: the Brazilian experience. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.). National innovation systems, pp. 414-450, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dodgson, M., Matthews, J., Kastelle, K. and Hu, M. C. (2008) The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks, Research Policy 37: 430-445.
Dosi, G., Llerena, P., and Sylos Labini, M. (2006) The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European paradox', Research Policy 35:1450-1464.
Eshima, Y. (2003) Impact of public policy towards innovative SMEs in Japan, Journal of Small Business Management 41(1): 85-93.
Foro Consultivo Científico y tecnológico (2006) Diagnóstico de la política científica, tecnológica y de fomento de la innovación en México (2000-2006), Mexico D.F.
Freeman, C. (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
Georghiou, L. (1998) Issues in the evaluation of innovation and technology policy, Evaluation 4: 37-51.
Georghiou, L. and Roessner, D. (2000) Evaluating technology programs: Tools and methods, Research Policy 29(4-5): 657-678.
Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004) Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 271-303.
Hodgson, G. M. (1999) Evolution and institutions, Elgar, Cheltenham.
Japan Small and Medium Enterprise Agency (2008) White paper on small and medium enterprises in Japan, Tokyo.
Kim, L. (1997) Imitation to innovation. The dynamics of Korean technological learning, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Kuhlmann, S. (1998) Moderation in policy making? Science and technology policy evaluation beyond impact measurement: The case of Germany, Evaluation 4(2): 130-148.
Kuran, T. (1997) Islam and underdevelopment: An old puzzle revisited, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 153: 41-72.
Lach, S. (2002) Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel, The Journal of Industrial Economics, L(4): 369-390.
Laranja, M., Uyarra, E. and Flanagan, K. (2008) Policies for science, technology and innovation. Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting, Research Policy 37(5): 823-35.
Leonard, D. (1996) Wellsprings of knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Lim, Y. (1999) Technology and productivity, The Korean way of learning and catching up, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992) National systems of innovation, Pinter, London.
Malerba, F. (Ed.) (2004) Sectoral systems of innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mazzoleni, R., and Nelson, R.R. (2007) Public research institutions and economic catching up. Research Policy 36(10):1512-1528.
Mohnen, P., and Roeller, L.-H. (2005) Complementarities in innovation policy, European Economic Review, 49, 1431-1450.
National Research Council of Canada (NRC): Mandate, mission, values, program goals and strategic objectives, Ottawa. Retrieved from www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/irap/about/mandate.html
National Science Foundation (2008) Science and engineering indicators, Washington DC.
Nelson, R. R., (Ed.) (2003) National innovation systems, Oxford University Press, New York.
Nelson, R. R. (2005) Technology, institutions and economic growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap Press, Boston.
Niosi, J., 2002. National systems of innovation are x-efficient. Why some are slow learners, Research Policy 31(2): 291-302.
OECD (2008) Main science and technology indicators, Volume 1, Paris.
Osman-Gani, A. (2004) Human capital development in Singapore: An analysis of national policy perspectives, Advances in developing human resources 6: 276-289.
Parayil, G. (2005) From 'Silicon Island to Biopolis of Asia': Innovation policy and shifting competitive strategy in Singapore, California Management Review 47(2): 50-74.
Pugliese, J. C. (Ed.) (2003) Políticas de estado para la universidad argentina, Ministerio de educación, ciencia y tecnología, Buenos Aires.
RAND Corporation (2006) Evaluation and recommendations for improvement of the Department of Defense SBIR Program. Santa Monica, CA.
Romer, P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 94: 1001- 1037.
Rosenberg, N. (2000) Schumpeter and the endogeneity of technology, Routledge, London.
Sabatier, P. (Ed.) (1999) Theories of the policy process, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Sands, A. 2005. The Irish software industry. In A. Arora and A. Gambardella (Eds.), From underdogs to tigers. The rise and growth of the software industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland and Israel, pp. 41- 71, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Saviotti, P. P. and Pyka, A. (2004) Economic development by the creation of new sectors, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14: 1-35.
Shapira, P. and Kuhlmann, S. (Ed.) (2003) Learning from science and technology policy evaluation, experiences from the United States and Europe, Elgar, Cheltenham.
Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1-2): 4-32.
Sterman, J. (2002) All models are wrong, System Dynamics Review 18: 510-531.
Tassey , G. (2007) Tax incentives for innovation: Time to restructure the R&E tax credit, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6): 605-615.
United Nations (UN) (2007/8) UN Human Development Report, New York.
United States President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2008) University-private sector research partnerships in the innovation ecosystem, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington DC.
Wessner, C. (Ed.) (1999) The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and opportunities, National Academies Press, Washington DC.

eContent Home




