Archives
The Fifth Discipline in a highly disciplined Singapore: Innovative learning organisations and national culture
Kala S Retna
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Abstract
This paper argues that the Learning Organisation (LO) concept is not culturally neutral and that any assessment of its usefulness must be situated within an understanding of the national cultural framework in which organisations are embedded.
Although the Learning Organisation (LO) concept is popular amongst both practitioners and academics in a wide range of countries, the theory is largely grounded in the thought of US business schools and the experience of large US corporations. National culture is invisible in the LO literature. This is primarily written from an American standpoint and the degree to which it is relevant to international practice is debatable.
This paper surveys the LO concept within the context of globalisation, focusing on Singapore organisations. It draws on a critical examination of Hofstede's national culture dimensions to create a framework for the study of the adoption and adaptation of the LO concept by Singapore organisations.
Keywords
innovation, learning organisation, cultural framework, globalisation, cultural differences
References
Ackoff RL (1994) The Democratic Organisation, New York: Oxford University Press.
Barr MD (1999) Lee Kuan Yew: Race, Culture and Gene's, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Manila 29(2).
Camina MM (2000) Research note: Cultural gaps in cross-national cooperation: The legacy of empires in Macedonia, Organization Studies 21.
Cunningham JB and Gerrard P (2000) Characteristics of Well-Performing organisations in Singapore, Singapore Management Review 22(1).
Craig M J (2001) Culture Shock - Singapore, Times Book International, Singapore
De Geus A (1997) The Living Company, Harvard Business Review, March/April.
Dofman P, Howell J and Bauista J (1997) Dimensions of National Culture and Work-related Beliefs: Hofstede revisited, in Fernandez D, Carlson D, Stepina L and Nicholson J, 1997, Hofestede's Country Classification 25 Years Later, The Journal of Social Psychology 173: 43-54
Drucker PF (1994) Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge, California Management Review 41(2): 79-94
Elenkov SD (1998) Can American management concepts work in Russia? A cross-cultural comparative study, California Management Review Summer 40(1)
Flood RL (1999) Rethinking the Fifth Discipline, Learning Within the Unknowable, London: Routledge.
Garratt B (1999) The Learning Organisation 15 years on: some personal reflections, The Learning Organisations 6(5).
Goodwin J and Goodwin D (1999) Ethical Judgements Across Cultures: A Comparison Between Business Students From Malaysia and New Zealand, Journal Of Business Ethics (18)3.
Grant SG, Petrovic-Lazarevic S and Berrell M (2000) Significance of Recognition of Australian and Singaporean Cross Cultural Differences In The Decision-Making Process, Working Paper 17/00, April, Monash University.
Hackman D and Kleiner BH (1990) The Nature of Effective Management in Singapore, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 11(4).
Hampden-Turner CM and Trompenaars F (1996) Doing Business in Asia, in P Joynt and M Warner (eds) Managing Across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives, London: International Thomson Business Press.
Hoecklin L (1995) Managing Cultural Differences - Strategies for Competitive Advantage, England, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Hofstede G (1993) Cultural Constraints In Management Theories, Academy of Management Executive 7(1): 81-94
Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede G and Bond MH (1988) The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth, Organizational Dynamics 16(4).
Hofstede G (1984) Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning, Asia Pacific, Journal of Management 1: 81-90.
Hofstede G (1983) The Cultural Relativity Of Organisational Practices and Theories, Journal of International Business Studies 14.
Hofestede G (1980) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Irene C and Joseph P (1995) Relationship on Work-Related Values of Singaporean and Japanese Managers in Singapore, Human Relations 48(10): 1149-1170.
Kwang NA (2001) Why Asians are less creative than Westerners, Singapore, Prentice Hall
Mark FP, Peter S, Adebowale A and Sabino A (1995) Role Conflict, Ambiguity And Overload: A 21-Nation Study, Academy of Management Journal 38 (2): 429-452.
McGill ME and Slocum JWJ (1993) Unlearning the Organisation, Organizational Dynamics 22.
Michael P, Prooijen V and Frans AJ (1992) The Competitive Advantage of European Nations: The Impact of National Culture - A Missing Element in Porter's Analysis? European Management Journal 10(2): 173-178.
Nevis EC (1995) Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems, Sloan Management Review Winter: 73-85.
Newman KL and Nollen SD (1996) Culture and Congruence: The Fit Between Management Practices and National Culture, Journal of International Business Studies 27(3).
Pearson CAL and Entrekin L (1996) An assessment of organisational practices in Singapore, Business: The Management Development Journal of Singapore.
Pedler MJ, Burgoyne JG and Boydell TH (1991) The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Ralson DA, Egri P, Stewart S, Terpstra RH and Kaicheng Y (1999) Doing business in the 21st Century with the new generation of Chinese managers: a study of generalisational shifts in work values in China, Journal of International Business Studies 30.
Roberts K and Boyacigiller N (1997) Cross-National Organisational Research of the Blind Men, in Fernandez D, Carlson D, Stepina L and Nicholson J, ‘Hofestede's country classification 25 years later', The Journal of Social Psychology 173: 43-54.
Schein EH (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schwartz SH (1990) Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and Proposed Refinements, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21(2).
Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross R, Roth G and Smith B (1999) The Dance of Change, New York: Doubleday.
Senge P (1994) The Fifth Discipline Fieldwork, London: Century.
Senge P (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art And Practice Of The Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
Shane S (1995) Uncertainty Avoidance and The Preference for Innovation Championing Roles, Journal of International Business Studies 26(1).
Stott K and Guat TL (2000) Leadership in Singapore Schools: The Impact of National Culture, Asia Pacific Journal of Education 20(2): 99-109.
Triandis HC (1994) Individualism and Collectivism, Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Trompenaars F (1993) Riding the Waves of Culture, London: The Economist Books.
Tsang EWK (1993) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organisation: A Dichotomy Between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research, Human Relations 50(1).
Watkins K and Marsick V (1993) Sculpting the Learning Organisation: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Wei KK, Watson RT and Walczuch RM (1998) Reducing Status Effects With Computer-Mediated Communication: Evidence From Two Distinct National Cultures, Journal of Management Information Systems Summer.
West P (1994) The Learning Organisation: Losing The Luggage In Transit, Journal of European Industrial Training 18(11): 30-38.
Westwood RI, Tsang SFY and Kirkbride PS (1992) Chinese Conflict Behaviour: Cultural Antecedents and Behavioural Consequences, Organisation Development Journal 10(2): 287-301
eContent Home