Archives
Personal networks and IT innovation within the Esprit Programme: Some evidence from the UK
Dimitris Assimakopoulos
Grenoble Ecole de Management, France
Stuart Macdonald
Sheffield University Management School, United Kingdom
Abstract
The European Strategic Programme for Research in Information Technologies (Esprit) was created back in 1983 as a defensive response to the US and Japanese lead in information technologies (IT).
Esprit was driven by the belief that intra-EU collaboration is an effective means of enhancing the competitiveness of the European IT industry. Esprit endured in various forms for almost two decades, always focusing on European collaboration for European innovation and competitiveness in IT.
This paper investigates the personal networks of UK main contractors in Esprit. The empirical evidence is based on the comparative evaluation of 10 successful Esprit projects with UK main contractors.
The findings show that the world of IT innovation is borderless and that UK firms accommodated a broad range of informal external linkages valuable for IT innovation with counterparts in the US, despite the Euro-centric policy of Brussels.
Keywords
informal networks, IT innovation, collaboration, EU policy, Esprit
References
Aldrich H and von Glinow M (1992) Personal networks and infrastructure development, in Gibson D et al (eds) Technopolis Phenomenon, Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp.125-145.
Assimakopoulos D and Macdonald S (2002) A Dual Approach to Understanding Information Networks, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations 1: 1-16.
Assimakopoulos D and Macdonald S (1999) Collaboration and Innovation Networks in Esprit, Prometheus 17: 299-308.
Assimakopoulos D, Piekkari R and Macdonald S (2000a) 'ESPRIT: Europe's Response to US and Japanese Domination in IT', paper presented at the Eighth Schumpeter Conference on 'Change, Development and Transformation', CRIC, University of Manchester, Manchester, July.
Assimakopoulos D, Chrissafis A, Gustavsson P, Macdonald S and Marschan-Piekkari R (2000b) Exploiting Informal Information Flow in the IST Programme, Final InEsprit (project 29538) Report, Brussels, June.
Badaracco J (1991) The Knowledge Link, Boston MA, Harvard Business School Press.
Boisot M (1998) Knowledge Assets, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Borgatti SP, Everett MG and Freeman LC (1999) UCINET V, Columbia, Analytic Technologies.
Burt R (2000) The Network Structure of Social Capital, in Sutton RI and Staw BM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior 22, Elsevier.
Burt R (1987) Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence, American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287-1335.
Coles AM, Harris L and Dickson K (2003) Testing Goodwill: Conflict and Cooperation in New Product Development Networks, International Journal of Technology Management 25: 51-64.
Freeman LC (1998) Exploring Social Structure Using Dynamic Three-dimensional Color Images, Social Networks 20: 109-118.
Georghiou L (1999) Socio-economic effects of collaborative R&D: European experiences, Journal of Technology Transfer 24: 69-79.
Georghiou L et al (1992) The Impact of European Community Policies for Research and Technological Development upon Science and Technology in the UK, Report prepared for DGXII, UKIMPACT, London.
Giusti W and Georghiou L (1988) The use of co-nomination analysis in real-time evaluation of an R&D programme, Scientometrics 14: 265-281.
Hagedoorn J and Schakenraad J (1993) A comparison of private and subsidised R&D partnerships in the European information technology industry, Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 373-390.
Hagedoorn J, Link AN and Vonortas NS (2000) Research partnerships, Research Policy 29: 567-586.
Hamel G, Doz Y and Prahalad C (1989) Collaborate with your competitors - and win, Harvard Business Review Jan/Feb: 133-9.
Johannisson B (1998) Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: spatial and functional patterns, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 10: 297-312.
Mytelka L (1995) Dancing with wolves: global oligopolies and strategic partnerships, in Hagedoorn J (ed) Technical Change and World Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.182-204.
Mytelka L and Delapierre M (1987) The alliance strategies of European firms in the information technology industry and the role of Esprit, Journal of Common Market Studies 26: 231-253.
Narula R (1999) Explaining the growth of strategic R&D alliances by European firms, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 711-723.
Narula R and Hagedoorn J (1999) Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements, Technovation 19: 283-294.
Osborn R and Hagedoorn J (1997) The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of inter-organisational alliances and networks, Academy of Management Journal 40: 261-278.
Peterson J (1991) Technology policy in Europe: Explaining the Framework Programme and Eureka in theory and practice, Journal of Common Market Studies 29: 269-290.
Piekkari R, Macdonald S and Assimakopoulos D (2001) In bed with a stranger: finding partners for collaboration in Esprit, Science and Public Policy 28: 68-78.
Quintas P and Guy K (1995) Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm, Research Policy 24: 325-348.
Ray T (1998) Collaborative research in Japan and the West: A case study of Britain's response to MITI's fifth generation computer initiative, in Hemmert M and Oberlander C (eds) Technology and Innovation in Japan, Routledge, London, pp.151-169.
Richardson D and Presley B (1999) MAGE 5.4, Biochemistry Department, Duke University, Durham NC.
Wasserman S and Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
eContent Home