Archives

Developmental conditions of UK biopharmaceutical ventures

Elizabeth Garnsey
Centre for Technology Management, Institute for Manufacture, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

A Penrosean approach is applied to UK biopharmaceutical firms in the 1990s to explore the interplay of internal and external dynamics in new firms' development. The way in which the biotech sector has emerged shapes the external conditions in which new ventures operate.

The very distinctiveness of biotech ventures illuminates common developmental processes in all new firms. The capacity of firms of this kind to create outstanding value attracts investors, ostensibly on a longer term basis than in other sectors. But facing similar problems of start up and growth as other new firms, UK biopharm ventures are under pressure to achieve returns before most of them are capable of fulfilling their potential.

Keywords

biotechnology, biopharmaceutical ventures, new firm development, value creation, investment return, realising potential


Toggle references

References

Alvarez S and Barney J (2000) Entrepreneurial Capabilities, in Meyer G and Heppard K Entrepreneurship as Strategy, Competing on the Entrepreneurial Edge, Sage, London.

Arthur Andersen (1997) UK Biotech '97- Making the Right Moves, Arthur Andersen, London.

Arthur Andersen (1998) Technology Transfer in the UK Life Sciences, Arthur Andersen, London.

Bahrami H and Evans S (1995) Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship, California Management Review 37(3): 62-88.

Bank of England (1996) The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London.

Barnum S (1998) Biotechnology: An Introduction, Wardsworth Publishing, NY.

BioIndustry Association (1998) Making the Manufacturing Breakthrough, an investigation into UK biopharmaceutical manufacturing requirements, Report of the BioIndustry Association Manufacturing Committee (P Edwards, Ruston Poole International, Chair).

Bower J (1991) Company and Campus Partnerships, supporting technology transfer, Routledge, London.

Brown S and Eisenhardt K (1998) Competing on the Edge, Strategy as Structured Chaos, Harvard Business School Press.

Caspar S and Kettler H (2001) National Institutional Frameworks and the Hybridization of Entrepreneurial Business Models: the German and UK Biotechnology Sectors, Industry and Innovation 8: 5-30.

Coopey R and Clark D (1995) 3i, Fifty Years Investing in Industry, Oxford University Press.

Dodgson M (1990) The Management of Technological Learning; lessons from a biotechnology company, de Gruyter, Berlin, NY.

De Rond M (forthcoming) Strategic Alliances as Social Facts, Cambridge University Press.

Dubinkas F (ed) (1988) Making Time, Ethnographies of High-Technology Organizations, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

Ernst & Young (2001) Focus on Fundamentals, Ernst & Young, NY.

Ernst & Young (1998) Continental Shift, European Life Sciences 98, Ernst & Young, London.

Feldman M and Ronzio C (2001) Closing the innovative loop: moving from the laboratory to the shop floor in biotechnology manufacturing entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 13(2001): 1-16.

Fransman M (2002) Telecoms in the Internet Age, Oxford University Press.

Freeman C (1995) The 'National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 5-24.

Garnsey E (1995) High Technology Renewal and the UK Investment Problem, Journal of General Management Summer 20(4): 1-22.

Garnsey E and Heffernan P (2001) ‘Growth Setbacks in New Firms', Conference on the Limits of Knowledge, ESRC Priority Network on Complex Dynamic Processes, NEXSUS, Budapest, June 22-23, 2001.

Garnsey E (1998) A Theory of the Early Growth of the Firm, Industrial and Corporate Change 7(3).

Hannan M and Carroll G (1992) Dynamics of Organizational Populations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kenney M (1986) Biotechnology, The University Industrial Complex, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

Harper D (1996) Entrepreneurships and the Market Process, An enquiry into the growth of knowledge, Routledge, London.

Kenney M (1986) Schumpeterian innovation and entrepreneurs in capitalism: a case study of the US biotechnology industry, Research Policy 15: 21-31.

Koestler A (1964) The Act of Creation, Hutchinson, London.

Kohler R (1975) The history of biochemistry: a survey, Journal of the History of Biology 8(Fall): 275-318.

Latter D and Garnsey E (1995) Venture Capital and High Technology Enterprise, Cambridge Research Papers in Management Studies 1995-6(1): 1-29.

Loasby B (1993) Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics, Routledge, London.

McKelvey M (1996) Evolutionary Innovations: the Business of Biotechnology, Oxford University Press.

Metcalfe S (1995) Technology systems in an evolutionary framework, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 25-46.

Metcalfe S (2000) Restless Capitalism, Experimental Economics, in During W and Oakey R and Kipling M (eds) Technology-Based Firms at the Turn of the Century, Pergamon Press.

Metcalfe S (1995) Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19: 25-46.

Oakey R (1995) High-Technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth, Paul Chapman Publishing, London.

Oakey R, Faulkner W, Cooper S and Walsh V (1990) New firms in the Biotechnology Industry, Pinter, London.

Penrose E (1995) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, reprint of 1959 edn by Blackwell.

Pharma http://www.pharma.com.

Porter M (1998) Competitive Strategy - Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, The Free Press, New York (1st edn 1980).

Powell W (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry, Journal.

Schumpeter J (1912) The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.

Schumpeter J (1928) The Instability of Capitalism, The Economic Journal 38(151).

Storey D (1994) Understanding the Small Firm Sector, Routledge, London.

Strickland S (1972) Politics, Science and Dread Disease, Harvard UP, Cambridge Mass.

Utterback J (1994) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Wilson EO (1992) The Diversity of Life, Penguin, London.

Witt U (2000) Changing Cognitive Frames - Changing Organizational Forms: An Entrepreneurial Theory of Organizational Development, Industrial and Corporate Change 9: 733-755.

Zucker L, Darby M and Armstrong J (1998) Geographically localised knowledge: Spillovers or Markets? Economic Inquiry 36: 65-86.

Zucker L, Darby M and Brewer M (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises, American Economic Review 88(1): 290-306. 



Web Feed

Latest Articles

Call for Papers

Innovation Policy in the Creative Industries
Volume 11/2
Deadline: 1st Mar 2009


Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies
Volume 11/3
Deadline: 15th Apr 2009


Public Sector Innovation
Volume 12/1
Deadline: 29th Jul 2009


Innovation in Social Entrepreneurship
Volume 12/3
Deadline: 1st Mar 2010


Special Issues

Innovation in Social Entrepreneurship


Public Sector Innovation


Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies


Innovation Policy in the Creative Industries


Innovation and the City – Innovative Cities
Contents


Food Related Innovation: Technology, Genetics and Consumer Impacts
Summary | Contents


Nurturing the Knowledge Tree: CSIRO in Australia's Innovation Systems
Summary | Contents


Innovation in China: Harmonious Transformation?
Summary | Contents


Innovation and Economic Development: Lessons from Latin America
Contents


Biotechnology and Telecommunications
Summary | Contents


Corporate Sustainability: Governance, Innovation Strategy, Development and Methods
Contents




Website by Arrowsmith Websites. Business, Government & Corporate Websites, Web Hosting, Domain Names & SEO. Maleny, Sunshine Coast, Australia.