Archives

US Innovation Policy: Creating (and expanding) a national agenda for global competitiveness

Thomas A Hemphill
Department of Strategic Management and Public Policy, School of Business, George Washington University, Alexandria VA, United States of America

Abstract

While many critics of the state of US global competitiveness believed they were faint voices in the economic policy wilderness, their concerns were being heeded by a leading national economic policy group, the Council on Competitiveness. The National Innovation Initiative Report (Innovative America), released by the Council on Competitiveness in December 2004, presents a national innovation policy agenda (under three broad categories of Talent, Investment, and Infrastructure) for the public and private sector to debate.

The Bush Administration, under its innovation policy agenda (A New Generation of American Innovation and American Competitiveness Initiative) released in April 2004 and January 2006, has emphasized three major technology policy initiatives (hydrogen fuel technology, health information technology, and broadband technology development) and increased federal R&D funding and tax incentives (totaling $5.9 billion for FY07) respectively. The weakness of both policy agenda approaches is in the narrow interpretation of 'innovation'; that is, focusing on the 'technology' side of innovation at the expense of market knowledge or organizational innovation In general, both public and private sector efforts need to be enlisted to encourage inter-organizational scientific and engineering communications across organizations and national borders (so-called 'public spaces'); create an internal environment within US corporations that is conducive to, not only technological, but also organizational innovation; and develop metrics to measure an expanded national inventory of innovation activities - beyond that of traditional science and technology indicators.

Keywords

competitiveness, innovation policy, national innovation system, organizational innovation, technology


Toggle references

References

Brynjolfsson E and Hitt L (2000) Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4): 23-48.

Council on Competitiveness (2004) Innovate America (National Innovation Report) Washington DC, December.

Domestic Policy Council (2006) American Competitiveness Initiative: Leading the World in Innovation, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington DC, February.

Drucker P (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York: HarperCollins.

Freeman C (1987) Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

Friedman TL (2004) Losing Our Edge, The New York Times April 22, Section A: 27.

Friedman TL (2005) Bush Disarms, Unilaterally, The New York Times, April 15, Section A: 19.

Kalil T (2004) Google: Lessons for America's Innovation Policy, Center for American Progress, May 14, http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.aspx?c= biJRJ8OVF&b =71217&printmodes=1, accessed on November 30 2005.

Jarboe KP (2004) National Innovation Policy: An Urgent US Need, New Technology Week May 3, http://www.athenaalliance.org/apapers/NatInnovpolicy.html, accessed on April 2 2005.

Lester R and Piore M (2005) National Innovation Summit Only Gets it Half Right, IndustryWeek.com, February 16, http://www.industryweek.com/PrintArticle.aspx ArticleID+9964, accessed April 2 2005.

Lundvall B-A (1995) National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.

Metcalfe S (1995) The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives, in Paul Stoneman (ed) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US): Blackwell Publishers.

Nelson R (ed) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Patel P and Pavitt K (1994) The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems, STI Review, No 14, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

Popper SW and Wagner CS (2002) New Foundations for Growth: The US Innovation System Today and Tomorrow (MR-1338.0-OSTP) RAND, Washington DC, January.

The Library of Congress (Thomas) 2005 (2006) A Bill to Provide National Innovation Initiative (National Innovation Act of 2005) S.2109 (December 15 2005) HR 4654 (January 3 2006) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02109:@@@ D&summ2=m&, accessed on July 11 2006.

Underwood R (2005) Walking the Talk? Fast Company March 25-26.

Von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

The White House (2004) A New Generation of American Innovation, April.



Web Feed

Latest Articles

Call for Papers

Innovation Policy in the Creative Industries
Volume 11/2
Deadline: 1st Mar 2009


Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies
Volume 11/3
Deadline: 15th Apr 2009


Public Sector Innovation
Volume 12/1
Deadline: 29th Jul 2009


Innovation in Social Entrepreneurship
Volume 12/3
Deadline: 1st Mar 2010


Special Issues

Innovation in Social Entrepreneurship


Public Sector Innovation


Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies


Innovation Policy in the Creative Industries


Innovation and the City – Innovative Cities
Contents


Food Related Innovation: Technology, Genetics and Consumer Impacts
Summary | Contents


Nurturing the Knowledge Tree: CSIRO in Australia's Innovation Systems
Summary | Contents


Innovation in China: Harmonious Transformation?
Summary | Contents


Innovation and Economic Development: Lessons from Latin America
Contents


Biotechnology and Telecommunications
Summary | Contents


Corporate Sustainability: Governance, Innovation Strategy, Development and Methods
Contents




Website by Arrowsmith Websites. Business, Government & Corporate Websites, Web Hosting, Domain Names & SEO. Maleny, Sunshine Coast, Australia.